![passion and the moon secrets passion and the moon secrets](https://img.etsystatic.com/il/0cdc57/1285571007/il_fullxfull.1285571007_3n6s.jpg)
- Passion and the moon secrets movie#
- Passion and the moon secrets free#
- Passion and the moon secrets crack#
Passion and the moon secrets free#
Finally, he can try and free this girl from her baggage.
![passion and the moon secrets passion and the moon secrets](http://static.tvmaze.com/uploads/images/original_untouched/291/729198.jpg)
The most telling imagery comes with Clift spelunking by rope into the depths of a cave searching out his deepest memories.
Passion and the moon secrets crack#
However, to crack his theory, he must come to terms with his own history, and it proves a taxing ordeal for his wife (Susan Kohner) who worries she might lose her “Sigi” to his work or, worse yet, one of his patients.Īnd still, he keeps probing - daring to wade into his own trauma to better understand Cecily. Together they wade through her issues from sexual repressions, nightmares, and childhood traumas.Įven Frau Potiphar and Joseph are brought up as symbolic figures in a parable - well, it’s a case study for Freud really - explaining a bit of Cecily’s buried angst through Biblical allusion. Breuer and then to Freud himself.Īs they go deeper, Freud, using hypnosis, finds out she is infatuated with the memory of her father.
![passion and the moon secrets passion and the moon secrets](https://d.newsweek.com/en/full/1057183/love-nikki-star-secrets-event-guide-styling-battle-2v2-tips-outfit-suits-cost-rising.png)
It gets to be too much as she transfers her affection first to Dr. He passes her well-being to the care of his pupil because he has his own issues.
![passion and the moon secrets passion and the moon secrets](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/82/49/f3/8249f3b59f7ee9156cd1d39f8f13e4be.jpg)
Passion and the moon secrets movie#
The majority of the movie is built around his work with a case study named Cecily (Susannah York) she was a patient of his esteemed mentor Joseph Breuer (Larry Parks). Thus, encouraged, Freud goes into the heart of the darkness, prepared to slay the dragons he might find there. It sounds more like witchcraft than human psychology, and I suppose in 1885 it might as well have been. He shares a conversation with a colleague who notes what a splendid thing to descend into hell and light your torch from its fires. His research and inquisitive mind prove his guiding light. Their subset is embodied most obviously by Professor Meynert, who sees such ideas as being beyond the scope of their profession, “Are we theologians or physicians?”īut while Freud wants the support of his colleagues, he’s not needlessly seeking out vainglory. In the early years of his career, beginning in 1885, Freud starts kicking around ideas as he comes to understand the subconscious and begins to dabble in hypnosis, “a dark art” many of the most prestigious practitioners in Vienna scoff at. Even the eery scoring, infused with rumbling drums, denotes similarly dark caverns in the mind. I only have the film to go by.Īlthough the world around him appears relatively simple, the black & white baroque style accentuates the metaphors of the light and darkness at war in the human psyches. However, I’m not Sigmund Freud so I couldn’t tell you. Admittedly, the backstage complications might elucidate a different story. Despite the fallow years that came following Freud, he is still the picture of distinguished vulnerability. Though Clift hardly seems the image of Freud nor Huston quite the man to bring the story to fruition, if nothing else, it should quash any rumors of Clift being totally sunk by the end of his career. Granted, this is based on the little I know of him from merely studying his influences on the field of psychology. Clift supplies a sensitivity I would have never attributed to Freud. To play Freud, he brought back Montgomery Clift from The Misfits, which immediately seems a strange choice. Even though the eminent philosopher crafted the skeleton of the story, Huston ultimately parted ways with Satre because the mammoth script he provided was unshootable. In fact, his collaboration on Freud: The Secret Passion began with a call on the talents of Jean-Paul Satre to pen a screenplay. Sadly, it never has the same impact from thenceforward.Īlthough the subject comes with its own sense of obvious intrigue, it somehow doesn’t seem to play to Huston’s own skills, restricting his talents to a very specific arena even if it was not slated to be a straightforward biopic. There’s a gravitas and a charisma wrapped about him that carries a certain commanding ethos. It was Sigmund Freud who effectively caused mankind to venture to “a region almost as black as hell itself: man’s unconscious.” What a bit of methodical showmanship it is and the styling is something that might only be pulled off by a man like Huston or Orson Welles. Into this category, he adds a third individual and with him a third frontier. In fact, he goes so far as to narrate the opening himself, relating how men like Copernicus and Darwin boldly went against the conventions of their day to help revolutionize people’s conception of the world. Freud: The Secret Passion is made by John Huston’s sense of narrative posturing.